Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 840 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $39.99 vs $299.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i9-9900T - $0.19 vs $1.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-7100 - 217 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
214
98.61751152073732%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
13.768115942028986%
Price, $
$299
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
87.02023726448012%
Multi-Core
2440
40.70737404070737%
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |