Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1703 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 4% better in Saints Row than Core i3-6320 - 166 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 20 vs 4 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |