Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 944 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i3-6320 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6320 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $298.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |