Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 490 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Celeron G3930T - 176 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - $39.0 vs $68.03
- Up to 41% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-6300 - $0.23 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
58.97435897435898%
Price, $
$68.03
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $68.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
169
96.02272727272727%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
43.42313787638668%
Multi-Core
948
37.33753446238677%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |