Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $92.61 vs $210.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 5 3600X - $0.58 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-6300 - 166 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $92.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |