Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $60.0 vs $124.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-10600KF - $0.26 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 76% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-540 - 403 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |