Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3760 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $60.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.39 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 36% better in Rust than Core i3-540 - 207 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |