Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-9590 is 1251 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 80% cheaper than FX-9590 - $60.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 80% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-9590 - $0.36 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 73 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-540 - 168 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7669 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |