Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $18.7 vs $165.86
- Up to 87% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-11600KF - $0.08 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 24% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-530 - 273 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 12 vs 4 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $18.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
273
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
13%
Price, $
$165.86
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |