Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i3-5015U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 174 days older than Core i3-5015U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-5015U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 15 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-5015U - 123 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-5015U - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-5015U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-5015U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Broadwell-U | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
