Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 1916 days newer than Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Core i3-4370 - 63 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 24 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$819
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $819 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36809 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1220
72.83582089552239%
Multi-Core
2407
21.208917085205744%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Haswell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |