Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1137 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 0% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 204 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 16 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
95.73770491803279%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
