Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1893 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $51.6 vs $395.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.2 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4350 - 280 vs 263 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5372 minutes ago
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5373 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |