Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i3-4170T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 700 days older than Core i3-4170T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170T
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 35 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Core i3-4170T - 159 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170T - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i3-4170T
Desktop • Mar 30th, 2015
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170T | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
