Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 1854 days newer than Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4170 - 132 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-4170 - 45 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |