Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4170 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2034 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $41.6 vs $1675.0
- Up to 97% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $0.23 vs $8.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4170 - 192 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 64 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $41.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.72/FPS
2%
Price, $
$1675
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,675 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |