Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1147 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 14% better in Starfield than Core i3-4160T - 58 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 24 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |