Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 3089 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4160T - 150 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
936
39.72835314091681%
Multi-Core
1796
14.628981021422172%
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
