Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3089 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than Core i3-4160T - 188 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
936
41.08867427568042%
Multi-Core
1796
23.201136804030487%
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |