Buy on Amazon
$877.22
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2185 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 121% better in League of Legends than Core i3-4160T - 232 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 32 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
232
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$877.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor
Buy for $877.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
