Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1953 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 11% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-4160T - 266 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 48 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1200
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |