Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 827 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 84% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $254.12 vs $1595.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $2.0 vs $12.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 54 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4160 - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 44 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
127
99.21875%
Value, $/FPS
$2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$254.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $254.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37309 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.47/FPS
16.038492381716118%
Price, $
$1595.95
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37310 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
90.55319148936171%
Multi-Core
2072
21.5407006965381%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 22 |
4 | Threads | 44 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 145 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |