Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3458 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4160 - 289 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 32 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
268
92.73356401384083%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
35.2317880794702%
Multi-Core
2072
11.340996168582375%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |