Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 376 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 88% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-6700K - $0.12 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 54 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 12% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-4160 - 185 vs 165 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - $189.95 vs $254.12
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
165
89.1891891891892%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$254.12
74%
Value Winner
Buy for $254.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
11.650485436893202%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
71.89189189189189%
Multi-Core
2072
42.3116193587911%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |