Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 897 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $19.99 vs $119.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-7400 - $0.09 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-7400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-4160 - 222 vs 221 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
221
99.54954954954955%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
16.666666666666664%
Price, $
$119
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
90.47619047619048%
Multi-Core
2072
64.10891089108911%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |