Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 1484 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 54 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4160 - 103 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 64 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1700
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,700 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 250 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |