Buy on Amazon
$45
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1183 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1300X - $45.0 vs $65.23
- Up to 29% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen 3 1300X - $0.22 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 1% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i3-4150 - 211 vs 209 FPS
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Intel Core i3-4150 Processor (3M Cache, 3.50 GHz) BX80646I34150
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18574 minutes ago
Large Scale Integration Ryzen 3 1300X R3 1300X 3.5 GHz Gaming Zen 0.014 Quad- Quad-Thread CPU Processor YD130XBBM4KAE Socket AM4 Implementing Multi-Threaded Operations
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18574 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
