Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Core i3-4010U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 3018 days newer than Core i3-4010U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 29% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4010U - 197 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4010U - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4010U
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4010U | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
