Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Core i3-4010U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2842 days newer than Core i3-4010U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4010U - 216 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4010U - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4010U | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |