Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2750 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 37 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4000M - 194 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |