Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1315 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 37 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Core i3-4000M - 54 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |