Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3719 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 123% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-390M - 492 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
492
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$232
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $232 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |