Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3399 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 13% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-390M - 250 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 12 vs 4 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
250
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |