Key Differences
In short — Core i3-390M outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-390M is 2921 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-390M - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 8 vs 4 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-390M
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
