Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 3018 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 35 vs 255 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 8% better in Fortnite than Core i3-380M - 227 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 56 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 28 |
| 4 | Threads | 56 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 255 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
