Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2176M outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2176M is 2717 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Performs up to 25% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-380M - 129 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Xeon E-2176M
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Xeon E-2176M |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
