Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700B outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700B is 2716 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700B - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700B
- Performs up to 33% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-380M - 574 vs 430 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Core i7-8700B
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i7-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
