Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 4800H is 3359 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 4800H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
- Performs up to 27% better in Dota 2 than Core i3-380M - 206 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Ryzen 7 4800H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 448SP |
| No | Overclockable | No |
