Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2803 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-350M - 186 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66304 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
292
21.407624633431084%
Multi-Core
595
6.5370248297077564%
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |