Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 3207 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 39% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-350M - 592 vs 425 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
592
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |