Key Differences
In short — FX-9370 outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9370 is 1251 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 35 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Core i3-350M - 253 vs 247 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
253
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$183
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $183 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |