Buy on Amazon
$25.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $450
Availability
MSRP in USD: $450
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2459 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3240T - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
149
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
