Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2423 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $25.7 vs $273.0
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-3240T - 165 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76587 minutes ago
Buy for $273 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76589 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
28.857327307940604%
Multi-Core
971
15.521099744245525%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |