Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1757 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $41.0 vs $495.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing Control than Core i7-7820X - $0.21 vs $2.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i3-3240 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Buy for $495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |