Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $41.0 vs $278.49
- Up to 77% better value when playing New World than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $0.41 vs $1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 55% better in New World than Core i3-3240 - 153 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
22%
Price, $
$278.49
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $278.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |