Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2191 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Rust than Core i3-3227U - 208 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 722 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |