Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1706 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 17 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 20% better in Minecraft than Core i3-3227U - 699 vs 584 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 24 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65766 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Single-Core
297
21.774193548387096%
Multi-Core
643
7.064381454625357%
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |