Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2669 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3227U - 182 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 20 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$440
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5599 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |