Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2989 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3227U - 204 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |