Key Differences
In short — Core i7-950 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-950 is 1189 days older than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-950 - $80.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i7-950 - $0.88 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i3-3220T - 92 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 8 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |